Document Type

Poster

Publication Date

2025

Abstract

Introduction

  • Cerebral palsy (CP) affects mobility and strength due to spasticity, incoordination, and weakness,1 making traditional high-load training challenging.
  • Blood flow restriction (BFR) training enables increased work and fatigue at a lower load, resulting in adaptations in muscle composition similar to those achieved with high-load training.2
  • Despite evidence supporting BFR use in neurological conditions3, limited information exists on how it will benefit young adults with ambulatory CP.4,5
  • Therefore, this study investigated the feasibility of BFR compared to progressive resistance training (PRT) in young adults with ambulatory cerebral palsy (CP).

Methods

  • Two individuals with spastic CP, both actively engaged in sports and recreation, participated in this case comparison (Table 1).
  • Completed two separate sessions of sit-to-stand movements. The first utilized high-load PRT with a weighted vest, while the other employed BFR training.
  • Outcome measures included the OMNI Perceived Exertion Scale, the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale, and an adverse symptoms interview.

Results

  • Both participants reported similar enjoyment for both exercise regimes (Figure 1) and lower perceived exertion with BFR (Figure 2).
  • Participant 1 reported better muscle engagement with BFR, while participant 2 experienced more delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) and fatigue with BFR compared to PRT.
  • Cuff application posed technical challenges for both participants.

Conclusion

  • Data trends indicate the effectiveness and safety of BFR as a viable intervention option for this population.
  • DOMS was the only adverse symptom experienced by both participants and is a consistent response to weightlifting.6
  • Participant comments highlight the potential of this training approach to provide similar, if not superior, muscular responses compared to PRT.
  • Individuals with CP should initially perform BFR regiments under the supervision of a trained professional to ensure proper adjustment of the tourniquet before using it independently.

Clinical Relevance

  • This study contributes to the growing evidence supporting BFR as a safe and effective strength training alternative for individuals with CP, when supervised by a trained professional to mitigate potential adverse events.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.