Master of Arts
Chairperson (Advisor 1)
Dr. Richard Brynteson
Reader (Advisor 2)
Dr. Charles Nuckles
Autologous blood has been regarded as a standard of care by many physicians, the increased safety of allogeneic blood and the expense of autologous blood have raised questions about the role of autologous donations. However, receiving any transfusion poses a risk to the patient. Due to the increased awareness of transfusion-transmitted viruses, many patients are unwilling to receive allogeneic transfusions. Large numbers of patients are treated without blood products. Many institutions have created "bloodless" surgery centers. Some of this is the result of the efforts of the Jehovah's Witness population. Members of the Jehovah's Witness faith believe that they are prohibited from receiving blood transfusions, based on their interpretation of the Bible. Their refusal to accept blood can be an ethical challenge to physicians. The Jehovah's Witness adult patient has a right to refuse blood transfusions and the health care professional has an obligation to carry out the patient's request.
This paper will give the background of blood transfusions, review autologous and allogeneic blood transfusions, consider the beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses about blood transfusions and investigate the options for bloodless surgery.
Recommended CitationSchmidt, K. A. (2000). The Effects of Blood Transfusions (Thesis, Concordia University, St. Paul). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.csp.edu/legacy-capstones_maom/112
Available when logged in with your CSP email address and password.
For users outside of the CSP community, use the "Request Access" button to submit a request for full text.